lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Integrity Service and SLIM
On Thu 2006-09-14 16:51:13, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:57:25 -0700
> Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > This is an updated request for comments on a proposed integrity
> > service framework and dummy provider, along with SLIM, a low
> > water-mark mandatory access control LSM module which utilizes the
> > integrity services as additional input to the access control decisions.
>
> Having carefully reviewed your code I have come to the firm conclusion that
> it is written in C. The next step is to put it all in -mm and see if
> anyone shouts at me.

Hmmm, "it is written in C" does not seem like good enough reason to
merge it... right?

I tried to understand what it is good for, but it seems that in
current state it is not much good for anything.

Will IBM work at splitting ssh so that trusted/untrusted portions are
separated?

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-20 00:39    [W:0.089 / U:1.396 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site