lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers
From
Date

Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> writes:

> [...] I take for agreed that both static and dynamic tracing are
> useful for different needs and that a full markup must support both
> and combinations, letting the user or the distribution choose.

Elaborating on Ingo's "one mechanism" comments, I believe a marker
widget needs to be generic at run time. We're not just looking for a
way of hiding direct calls to lttng in a marker macro. We're looking
for a way of marking spots & data in a uniform way, then later
(run-time) binding each of those markers to (tools such as) lttng
and/or systemtap.

- FChE
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-19 17:25    [W:0.108 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site