[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Raid 0 Swap?
    On Monday 04 September 2006 12:46, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
    > >> I thought kernel data weren't swapped at all?
    > If the swap code was swapped, who would swap it in again?
    > >Well, it's not that simple. Kernel uses both swappable and
    > >non-swappable memory internally. For some things, it's
    > >unswappable, for some, it's swappable. In general, it's
    > >impossible to say which parts of kernel will break (and
    > >in wich ways) if swap goes havoc.
    > In general, everything you type in as C code (.bss, .data, .text) should be
    > unswappable. kmalloc()ed areas are resident too, and kmalloc has a
    > parameter which defines whether the allocation can/cannot push userspace
    > pages into the swap (GFP_ATOMIC/GFP_IO). So if there is some
    > kernel-allocation swapped out, it is most likely to be marked as
    > 'userspace' so that the same algorithms can be used for swapin and -out.

    What are you guys talking about? IIRC kernel doesn't use
    swap for its vital data structures. I recall only one
    kernel thing which goes into swap: tmpfs data. Caching network
    filesystems may also use swappable data, but currently grep
    catches only cifs.

    IOW swap is for dirtied userspace data. Please correct me
    if I am wrong here.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-18 11:57    [W:0.021 / U:14.772 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site