Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Sep 2006 23:52:35 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> btw., you still have not retracted or corrected your false suggestion > that "concessions" or a "compromise" were possible and you did not > retract or correct your false accusation that i "dont want to make > them":
Sorry, I have nothing to retract and I'm not interesting in playing your word games. :-(
> > It's impossible to discuss this with you, because you're absolutely > > unwilling to make any concessions. What am I supposed to do than it's > > very clear to me, that you don't want to make any compromise anyway? > > while, as i explained it before, such a concession simply does not exist > - so i am not in the position to "make such a concession". There are > only two choices in essence: either we accept a generic static tracer, > or we reject it.
Wrong, this is about the minimum support, which can be used by both static and dynamic tracers.
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |