lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108
    Hi,

    On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > btw., you still have not retracted or corrected your false suggestion
    > that "concessions" or a "compromise" were possible and you did not
    > retract or correct your false accusation that i "dont want to make
    > them":

    Sorry, I have nothing to retract and I'm not interesting in playing your
    word games. :-(

    > > It's impossible to discuss this with you, because you're absolutely
    > > unwilling to make any concessions. What am I supposed to do than it's
    > > very clear to me, that you don't want to make any compromise anyway?
    >
    > while, as i explained it before, such a concession simply does not exist
    > - so i am not in the position to "make such a concession". There are
    > only two choices in essence: either we accept a generic static tracer,
    > or we reject it.

    Wrong, this is about the minimum support, which can be used by both static
    and dynamic tracers.

    bye, Roman
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-17 23:57    [W:4.062 / U:0.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site