Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Sep 2006 17:02:13 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: tracepoint maintainance models |
| |
Hi,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > This thread would be much better off talking about how to go about > > implementing lightweight markers rather than spent on mindless rants. > > i agree, as long as it's lightweight markers for _dynamic tracers_, so > that we keep our options open - as per the arguments above.
Could you please explain, why we can't have markers which are usable by any tracer?
bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |