lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: tracepoint maintainance models
    Hi,

    On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

    > > This thread would be much better off talking about how to go about
    > > implementing lightweight markers rather than spent on mindless rants.
    >
    > i agree, as long as it's lightweight markers for _dynamic tracers_, so
    > that we keep our options open - as per the arguments above.

    Could you please explain, why we can't have markers which are usable by
    any tracer?

    bye, Roman
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-17 17:07    [W:6.944 / U:1.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site