Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 17 Sep 2006 01:14:07 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
* Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> [...] instead of delving further into secondary issues, please let me > get back to the primary issues [...]
here's a list of some of those "secondary issues" that we were discussing, and which you opted not to "further dvelve into":
firstly, a factually wrong statement of yours:
> [...] any tracepoints have an maintainance overhead, which is barely > different between dynamic and static tracing [...]
secondly, a factually wrong statement of yours:
> [...] at the source level you can remove a static tracepoint as easily > as a dynamic tracepoint, [...]
thirdly, a factually wrong statement of yours:
> [...] It would also add virtually no maintainance overhead [...]
[see the previous mails for the full context on these items.]
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |