[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

    * Roman Zippel <> wrote:

    > Since my options are right now limited to a static tracer in first
    > place, [...]

    Lets see the equation of the current situation. On one side you want
    static tracing but you dont want to implement kprobes on m68k - although
    you probably could. On the other side there is the main kernel, which,
    if it ever accepted static tracepoints, could probably never get rid of

    so, you request the main kernel to accept hundreds of static tracepoints
    that would probably never go away, just because you are reluctant at the
    moment to implement kprobes? And that only to bridge a temporary period
    of time when m68k has no kprobes support yet? Combined with the fact
    that m68k was just fine without tracing for 13 years? Did i get that

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-17 01:11    [W:0.033 / U:21.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site