[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

* Roman Zippel <> wrote:

> Since my options are right now limited to a static tracer in first
> place, [...]

Lets see the equation of the current situation. On one side you want
static tracing but you dont want to implement kprobes on m68k - although
you probably could. On the other side there is the main kernel, which,
if it ever accepted static tracepoints, could probably never get rid of

so, you request the main kernel to accept hundreds of static tracepoints
that would probably never go away, just because you are reluctant at the
moment to implement kprobes? And that only to bridge a temporary period
of time when m68k has no kprobes support yet? Combined with the fact
that m68k was just fine without tracing for 13 years? Did i get that

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-17 01:11    [W:0.285 / U:4.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site