lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] kprobes: optimize branch placement
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:43:42 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> --- linux.orig/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -354,9 +354,8 @@ no_kprobe:
> */
> fastcall void *__kprobes trampoline_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL;
> - struct hlist_head *head;
> - struct hlist_node *node, *tmp;
> + struct kretprobe_instance *ri = NULL, *tmp;
> + struct list_head *head;
> unsigned long flags, orig_ret_address = 0;
> unsigned long trampoline_address =(unsigned long)&kretprobe_trampoline;

Wanna fix the whitespace wreckage while you're there??

i386's kprobe_handler() appears to forget to reenable preemption in the
if (p->pre_handler && p->pre_handler(p, regs)) case?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-17 01:01    [W:0.462 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site