lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

    * Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:

    > What Karim is sharing with us here (yet again) is the real in-field
    > experience of real users (ie: not kernel developers).

    well, Jes has that experience and Thomas too.

    > I mean, on one hand we have people explaining what they think a
    > tracing facility should and shouldn't do, and on the other hand we
    > have a guy who has been maintaining and shipping exactly that thing to
    > (paying!) customers for many years.

    so does Thomas and Jes. So what's the point?

    i judge LTT by its current code quality, not by its proponents shouting
    volume - and that quality is still quite poor at the moment. (and then
    there are the conceptual problems too, outlined numerous times) I have
    quoted specific example(s) for that in this thread. Furthermore, LTT
    does this:

    246 files changed, 26207 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

    and this gives me the shivers, for all the reasons i outlined.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-09-15 20:31    [W:0.021 / U:60.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site