Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 11:04:19 -0400 | From | Karim Yaghmour <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Jes Sorensen wrote: > Thank you for this, it just proves that taking this discussion any > further is a waste of everybody's time.
Sorry you feel this way.
> Nobody ever said you were irresponsible, but you are claiming that you > are able to define a finite set of static tracepoints that are relevant > to everybody. Or in other words, they are defined as being the ones > relevant to you.
No, I'm precisely not claiming that the tracepoints I was looking for were "relevant to everybody". They are, however, very relevant to any standard sysadmin or developer who wants to get a better picture of what his kernel is doing. Again, please refer to figure 2 of this article and explain to me why it's not relevant for standard users and developers to understand when these events happen inside the kernel: http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix2000/general/full_papers/yaghmour/yaghmour_html/index.html
Karim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |