Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 15:41:17 +0100 |
| |
Ar Gwe, 2006-09-15 am 15:34 +0200, ysgrifennodd Roman Zippel: > > Maintainability ? common good over individual weirdnesses ? Ability for > > people to concentrate on getting one good set of interfaces not twelve > > bad ones ? Consistency for user space ? > > Alan, you're making things up without any proof.
Welcome to my killfile. There isn't much point having a discussion with anyone who considers any view or fact not in agreement as "no proof" and any view or fact that favours them as "proven".
In the meantime perhaps the saner members of the static trace brigade can explain why gcc debug data isn't good enough for them when its good enough for kgdb to do single stepping at source level and variable printing ?
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |