Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 21:47:26 -0400 | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote: > > * Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > > > > > also, the other disadvantages i listed very much count too. Static > > > > > tracepoints are fundamentally limited because: > > > > > [...] > Right now they are > pretty heavy cons as far as LTT goes, so obviously they have a primary > impact on the topic at hand (whic is whether to merge LTT or not). >
Ingo, why are you arguing about static instrumentation when I don't submit any static instrumentation in my patch ? You can argue about static VS dynamic instrumentation all you want, but please don't apply this debate to a dicision about including or not a core tracing infrastructure that has nothing to do with the way instrumentation or probes are inserted.
Mathieu
OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |