Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:08:01 +1000 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 |
| |
Michel Dagenais wrote: > On Thu, 2006-14-09 at 16:33 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
>>BTW I don't mind KProbes as an option, but I have huge problem with making >>it the only option. > > > Indeed, KProbes SystemTAP and LTTng are complementary and people > involved in the three projects are cooperating.
That doesn't mean we want them all in the kernel.
The best aim would of course be to come up with a solution that has the advantages of all and disadvantages of none. That may be impossible, but if we can find one way to do things that is acceptable to all...
What's the huge problem with making kprobes the only option (that can't be fixed by doing a bit of coding)?
-- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |