[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [linux-pm] cpufreq terminally broken [was Re: community PM requirements/issues and PowerOP]
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:10:24PM +0400, Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Pavel,
> On 9/12/06, Pavel Machek <> wrote:
> >Can we at least try adding that, before deciding cpufreq is unsuitable
> >and starting new interface? I do not think issues are nearly as big as
> >you think.. (at user<->kernel interface level, anyway; you'll need big
> >changes under the hood).
> who talks about user <-> kernel interface level changes at the moment?!

Mostly Pavel is.

There are questions on how to set/get operating points between the
platform and user space, and some questions on one to make the space of
operating points extensible outside of compile time deployment nice.
But these questions aren't the ones I see folks fussing about.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-14 17:09    [W:0.066 / U:2.052 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site