[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/20] vm deadlock avoidance for NFS, NBD and iSCSI (take 7)

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Linus, when I mentioned swap over network to you in Ottawa, you said it was
> a valid use case, that people actually do and want this. Can you agree with
> the approach taken in these patches?

Well, in all honesty, I don't think I really said "valid", but that I said
that some crazy people want to do it, and that we should try to allow them
their foibles.

So I'd be nervous to do any _guarantees_. I think that good VM policies
should make it be something that works in general (the dirty mapping
limits in particular), but I'd be a bit nervous about anybody taking it
_too_ seriously. Crazy people are still crazy, they just might be right
under certain reasonably-well-controlled circumstances.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.171 / U:9.436 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site