[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/20] vm deadlock avoidance for NFS, NBD and iSCSI (take 7)

    On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > Linus, when I mentioned swap over network to you in Ottawa, you said it was
    > a valid use case, that people actually do and want this. Can you agree with
    > the approach taken in these patches?

    Well, in all honesty, I don't think I really said "valid", but that I said
    that some crazy people want to do it, and that we should try to allow them
    their foibles.

    So I'd be nervous to do any _guarantees_. I think that good VM policies
    should make it be something that works in general (the dirty mapping
    limits in particular), but I'd be a bit nervous about anybody taking it
    _too_ seriously. Crazy people are still crazy, they just might be right
    under certain reasonably-well-controlled circumstances.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.020 / U:55.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site