lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH] BC: resource beancounters (v4) (added user memory)
Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:02:06AM +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>
>> Sure. At the beginning I have one task with one BC. Then
>> 1. A thread is spawned and new BC is created;
>>
>
> Why do we have to create a BC for every new thread? A new BC is needed
> for every new service level instead IMO. And typically there wont be
> unlimited service levels.
>
That's the scenario we started from - each domain is served in a separate
BC with *threaded* Apache.
>
>> 2. New thread touches a new page (e.g. maps a new file) which is charged
>> to new BC
>> (and this means that this BC's must stay in memory till page is
>> uncharged);
>> 3. Thread exits after serving the request, but since it's mm is shared
>> with parent
>> all the touched pages stay resident and, thus, the new BC is still
>> pinned in memory.
>> Steps 1-3 are done multiple times for new pages (new files).
>> Remember that we're discussing the case when pages are not recharged.
>>
>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-12 19:19    [W:0.221 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site