lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Sep]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patches in this message
/
From
Date
Subject[PATCH 011 of 19] knfsd: lockd: make nlm_traverse_* more flexible

From: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>

This patch makes nlm_traverse{locks,blocks,shares} and friends
use a function pointer rather than a "action" enum.

This function pointer is given two nlm_hosts (one given by the
caller, the other taken from the lock/block/share currently
visited), and is free to do with them as it wants. If it returns a
non-zero value, the lockd/block/share is released.

Signed-off-by: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>

### Diffstat output
./fs/lockd/svclock.c | 33 +++----------
./fs/lockd/svcshare.c | 20 +++-----
./fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
./include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 15 ++----
./include/linux/lockd/share.h | 3 -
5 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

diff .prev/fs/lockd/svclock.c ./fs/lockd/svclock.c
--- .prev/fs/lockd/svclock.c 2006-09-01 10:44:39.000000000 +1000
+++ ./fs/lockd/svclock.c 2006-09-01 10:59:37.000000000 +1000
@@ -265,24 +265,20 @@ static void nlmsvc_release_block(struct
kref_put(&block->b_count, nlmsvc_free_block);
}

-static void nlmsvc_act_mark(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file)
-{
- struct nlm_block *block;
-
- down(&file->f_sema);
- list_for_each_entry(block, &file->f_blocks, b_flist)
- block->b_host->h_inuse = 1;
- up(&file->f_sema);
-}
-
-static void nlmsvc_act_unlock(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file)
+/*
+ * Loop over all blocks and delete blocks held by
+ * a matching host.
+ */
+void nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(struct nlm_host *host,
+ struct nlm_file *file,
+ nlm_host_match_fn_t match)
{
struct nlm_block *block, *next;

restart:
down(&file->f_sema);
list_for_each_entry_safe(block, next, &file->f_blocks, b_flist) {
- if (host != NULL && host != block->b_host)
+ if (!match(block->b_host, host))
continue;
/* Do not destroy blocks that are not on
* the global retry list - why? */
@@ -298,19 +294,6 @@ restart:
}

/*
- * Loop over all blocks and perform the action specified.
- * (NLM_ACT_CHECK handled by nlmsvc_inspect_file).
- */
-void
-nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file, int action)
-{
- if (action == NLM_ACT_MARK)
- nlmsvc_act_mark(host, file);
- else
- nlmsvc_act_unlock(host, file);
-}
-
-/*
* Initialize arguments for GRANTED call. The nlm_rqst structure
* has been cleared already.
*/
diff .prev/fs/lockd/svcshare.c ./fs/lockd/svcshare.c
--- .prev/fs/lockd/svcshare.c 2006-09-01 10:39:06.000000000 +1000
+++ ./fs/lockd/svcshare.c 2006-09-01 10:58:38.000000000 +1000
@@ -85,24 +85,20 @@ nlmsvc_unshare_file(struct nlm_host *hos
}

/*
- * Traverse all shares for a given file (and host).
- * NLM_ACT_CHECK is handled by nlmsvc_inspect_file.
+ * Traverse all shares for a given file, and delete
+ * those owned by the given (type of) host
*/
-void
-nlmsvc_traverse_shares(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file, int action)
+void nlmsvc_traverse_shares(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file,
+ nlm_host_match_fn_t match)
{
struct nlm_share *share, **shpp;

shpp = &file->f_shares;
while ((share = *shpp) != NULL) {
- if (action == NLM_ACT_MARK)
- share->s_host->h_inuse = 1;
- else if (action == NLM_ACT_UNLOCK) {
- if (host == NULL || host == share->s_host) {
- *shpp = share->s_next;
- kfree(share);
- continue;
- }
+ if (match(share->s_host, host)) {
+ *shpp = share->s_next;
+ kfree(share);
+ continue;
}
shpp = &share->s_next;
}
diff .prev/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c ./fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
--- .prev/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c 2006-09-01 10:45:16.000000000 +1000
+++ ./fs/lockd/svcsubs.c 2006-09-01 11:06:21.000000000 +1000
@@ -165,7 +165,8 @@ nlm_delete_file(struct nlm_file *file)
* action.
*/
static int
-nlm_traverse_locks(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file, int action)
+nlm_traverse_locks(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file,
+ nlm_host_match_fn_t match)
{
struct inode *inode = nlmsvc_file_inode(file);
struct file_lock *fl;
@@ -179,17 +180,11 @@ again:

/* update current lock count */
file->f_locks++;
+
lockhost = (struct nlm_host *) fl->fl_owner;
- if (action == NLM_ACT_MARK)
- lockhost->h_inuse = 1;
- else if (action == NLM_ACT_CHECK)
- return 1;
- else if (action == NLM_ACT_UNLOCK) {
+ if (match(lockhost, host)) {
struct file_lock lock = *fl;

- if (host && lockhost != host)
- continue;
-
lock.fl_type = F_UNLCK;
lock.fl_start = 0;
lock.fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
@@ -206,27 +201,42 @@ again:
}

/*
- * Operate on a single file
+ * Inspect a single file
+ */
+static inline int
+nlm_inspect_file(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file, nlm_host_match_fn_t match)
+{
+ nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(host, file, match);
+ nlmsvc_traverse_shares(host, file, match);
+ return nlm_traverse_locks(host, file, match);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Quick check whether there are still any locks, blocks or
+ * shares on a given file.
*/
static inline int
-nlm_inspect_file(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_file *file, int action)
+nlm_file_inuse(struct nlm_file *file)
{
- if (action == NLM_ACT_CHECK) {
- /* Fast path for mark and sweep garbage collection */
- if (file->f_count || list_empty(&file->f_blocks) || file->f_shares)
+ struct inode *inode = nlmsvc_file_inode(file);
+ struct file_lock *fl;
+
+ if (file->f_count || !list_empty(&file->f_blocks) || file->f_shares)
+ return 1;
+
+ for (fl = inode->i_flock; fl; fl = fl->fl_next) {
+ if (fl->fl_lmops == &nlmsvc_lock_operations)
return 1;
- } else {
- nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(host, file, action);
- nlmsvc_traverse_shares(host, file, action);
}
- return nlm_traverse_locks(host, file, action);
+ file->f_locks = 0;
+ return 0;
}

/*
* Loop over all files in the file table.
*/
static int
-nlm_traverse_files(struct nlm_host *host, int action)
+nlm_traverse_files(struct nlm_host *host, nlm_host_match_fn_t match)
{
struct hlist_node *pos, *next;
struct nlm_file *file;
@@ -240,7 +250,7 @@ nlm_traverse_files(struct nlm_host *host

/* Traverse locks, blocks and shares of this file
* and update file->f_locks count */
- if (nlm_inspect_file(host, file, action))
+ if (nlm_inspect_file(host, file, match))
ret = 1;

mutex_lock(&nlm_file_mutex);
@@ -277,23 +287,54 @@ nlm_release_file(struct nlm_file *file)
mutex_lock(&nlm_file_mutex);

/* If there are no more locks etc, delete the file */
- if(--file->f_count == 0) {
- if(!nlm_inspect_file(NULL, file, NLM_ACT_CHECK))
- nlm_delete_file(file);
- }
+ if (--file->f_count == 0 && !nlm_file_inuse(file))
+ nlm_delete_file(file);

mutex_unlock(&nlm_file_mutex);
}

/*
+ * Helpers function for resource traversal
+ *
+ * nlmsvc_mark_host:
+ * used by the garbage collector; simply sets h_inuse.
+ * Always returns 0.
+ *
+ * nlmsvc_same_host:
+ * returns 1 iff the two hosts match. Used to release
+ * all resources bound to a specific host.
+ *
+ * nlmsvc_is_client:
+ * returns 1 iff the host is a client.
+ * Used by nlmsvc_invalidate_all
+ */
+static int
+nlmsvc_mark_host(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_host *dummy)
+{
+ host->h_inuse = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+nlmsvc_same_host(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_host *other)
+{
+ return host == other;
+}
+
+static int
+nlmsvc_is_client(struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_host *dummy)
+{
+ return host->h_server;
+}
+
+/*
* Mark all hosts that still hold resources
*/
void
nlmsvc_mark_resources(void)
{
dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_mark_resources\n");
-
- nlm_traverse_files(NULL, NLM_ACT_MARK);
+ nlm_traverse_files(NULL, nlmsvc_mark_host);
}

/*
@@ -304,7 +345,7 @@ nlmsvc_free_host_resources(struct nlm_ho
{
dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_free_host_resources\n");

- if (nlm_traverse_files(host, NLM_ACT_UNLOCK)) {
+ if (nlm_traverse_files(host, nlmsvc_same_host)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING
"lockd: couldn't remove all locks held by %s\n",
host->h_name);
@@ -319,8 +360,16 @@ void
nlmsvc_invalidate_all(void)
{
struct nlm_host *host;
+
+ /* Release all locks held by NFS clients.
+ * Previously, the code would call
+ * nlmsvc_free_host_resources for each client in
+ * turn, which is about as inefficient as it gets.
+ * Now we just do it once in nlm_traverse_files.
+ */
+ nlm_traverse_files(NULL, nlmsvc_is_client);
+
while ((host = nlm_find_client()) != NULL) {
- nlmsvc_free_host_resources(host);
host->h_expires = 0;
host->h_killed = 1;
nlm_release_host(host);
diff .prev/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h ./include/linux/lockd/lockd.h
--- .prev/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h 2006-09-01 10:45:16.000000000 +1000
+++ ./include/linux/lockd/lockd.h 2006-09-01 10:58:38.000000000 +1000
@@ -134,13 +134,6 @@ struct nlm_block {
};

/*
- * Valid actions for nlmsvc_traverse_files
- */
-#define NLM_ACT_CHECK 0 /* check for locks */
-#define NLM_ACT_MARK 1 /* mark & sweep */
-#define NLM_ACT_UNLOCK 2 /* release all locks */
-
-/*
* Global variables
*/
extern struct rpc_program nlm_program;
@@ -183,6 +176,12 @@ void nsm_release(struct nsm_handle *)


/*
+ * This is used in garbage collection and resource reclaim
+ * A return value != 0 means destroy the lock/block/share
+ */
+typedef int (*nlm_host_match_fn_t)(struct nlm_host *cur, struct nlm_host *ref);
+
+/*
* Server-side lock handling
*/
u32 nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *, struct nlm_file *,
@@ -193,7 +192,7 @@ u32 nlmsvc_testlock(struct nlm_file *
u32 nlmsvc_cancel_blocked(struct nlm_file *, struct nlm_lock *);
unsigned long nlmsvc_retry_blocked(void);
void nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_file *,
- int action);
+ nlm_host_match_fn_t match);
void nlmsvc_grant_reply(struct svc_rqst *, struct nlm_cookie *, u32);

/*
diff .prev/include/linux/lockd/share.h ./include/linux/lockd/share.h
--- .prev/include/linux/lockd/share.h 2006-09-01 10:39:06.000000000 +1000
+++ ./include/linux/lockd/share.h 2006-09-01 10:58:38.000000000 +1000
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ u32 nlmsvc_share_file(struct nlm_host *,
struct nlm_args *);
u32 nlmsvc_unshare_file(struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_file *,
struct nlm_args *);
-void nlmsvc_traverse_shares(struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_file *, int);
+void nlmsvc_traverse_shares(struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_file *,
+ nlm_host_match_fn_t);

#endif /* LINUX_LOCKD_SHARE_H */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-09-01 06:43    [W:0.181 / U:4.364 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site