Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:56:02 +0000 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | ext3 vs reiserfs speed (was Re: metadata plugins (was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion)) |
| |
Hi!
> > Using guilt as an argument in a technical discussion is a flashing red > > sign that says "I have no technical rebuttal" > > Wow, that is really nervy. Let's recap this all: > > * reiser4 has a 2x performance advantage over the next fastest FS > (ext3), and when compression ships in a month that will double again as > well as save space. See http://www.namesys.com/benchmarks.html, and
Does that mean that ext3 is faster than reiser3? Wow, that would be good reason to switch default filesystem to ext3 (or reiser4?) in next suse release. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |