Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86 paravirt_ops: binary patching infrastructure | Date | Mon, 7 Aug 2006 07:38:13 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 07 August 2006 06:48, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT > +void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch *start, struct paravirt_patch *end)
It would be better to merge this with the existing LOCK prefix patching or perhaps the normal alternative() patcher (is there any particular reason you can't use it?)
Three alternative patching mechanisms just seems to be too many
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |