Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: PATCH 2 of 4] cpumask: export cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map consistently | From | Greg Banks <> | Date | Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:05:40 +1000 |
| |
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 00:32, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Greg Banks wrote: > > > cpumask: ensure that the cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map bitmasks, > > and hence all the macros in <linux/cpumask.h> that require them, are > > available to modules for all supported combinations of architecture > > and CONFIG_SMP. > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com> > > --- > > > > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++ > > arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c | 1 + > > arch/sh/kernel/smp.c | 1 + > > kernel/sched.c | 3 +++ > > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.18-rc2.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-01 17:53:25.000000000 +1000 > > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-02 23:01:20.535457863 +1000 > > @@ -4348,7 +4348,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_map); > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_SMP > > cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly = CPU_MASK_ALL; > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_online_map); > > > cpumask_t cpu_possible_map; > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map); > > cpumask_t cpu_online_map; > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_online_map); > > How come these are of different export types?
Because I screwed up. Fix coming later. I presume _GPL is the favoured form?
Greg. -- Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. I don't speak for SGI.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |