lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: PATCH 2 of 4] cpumask: export cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map consistently
From
Date
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 00:32, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Greg Banks wrote:
>
> > cpumask: ensure that the cpu_online_map and cpu_possible_map bitmasks,
> > and hence all the macros in <linux/cpumask.h> that require them, are
> > available to modules for all supported combinations of architecture
> > and CONFIG_SMP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Banks <gnb@melbourne.sgi.com>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 ++
> > arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
> > arch/sh/kernel/smp.c | 1 +
> > kernel/sched.c | 3 +++
> > 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.18-rc2.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-01 17:53:25.000000000 +1000
> > +++ linux-2.6.18-rc2/kernel/sched.c 2006-08-02 23:01:20.535457863 +1000
> > @@ -4348,7 +4348,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_present_map);
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> > cpumask_t cpu_online_map __read_mostly = CPU_MASK_ALL;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_online_map);
>
> > cpumask_t cpu_possible_map;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_possible_map);
> > cpumask_t cpu_online_map;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_online_map);
>
> How come these are of different export types?

Because I screwed up. Fix coming later. I presume _GPL
is the favoured form?

Greg.
--
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-07 05:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans