Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:16:04 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller |
| |
pj wrote: > I haven't read it yet, but I will likely agree that > this is an abuse of cpusets.
This likely just drove Srivatsa up a wall (sorry), as my comments in the earlier thread he referenced:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/26/58
enthusiastically supported adding a cpu controller interface to cpusets.
We need to think through what are the relations between CKRM controllers, containers and cpusets. But I don't think that people will naturally want to manage CKRM controllers via cpusets. That sounds odd to me now. My earlier enthusiasm for it seems wrong to me now.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |