lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] memory hotadd fixes [4/5] avoid check in acpi
From
Date
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 12:48 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:23:46 -0700
> keith mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> > > > What keeps 0xa0000000 to 0xa1000000 from being re-onlined by a bad call
> > > > to add_memory?
> > >
> > > Usual sparsemem's add_memory() checks whether there are sections in
> > > sparse_add_one_section(). then add_pages() returns -EEXIST (nothing to do).
> > > And ioresouce collision check will finally find collision because 0-0xbffffff
> > > resource will conflict with 0xa0000000 to 0xa10000000 area.
> > > But, x86_64 's (not sparsemem) add_pages() doen't do collision check, so it panics.
> >
> > I have paniced with your 5 patches while doing SPARSMEM.... I think
> > your 6th patch address the issues I was seeing.
> >


with the 6 patches things work as expected. It is nice to have the
sysfs devices online the correct amount of memory.

I was broken without this patch because invalid add_memory calls are
made on by box (yet another issue) during boot.

I will build my patch set on top of your 6 patches.

Thanks,
Keith

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-04 06:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site