Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:58:34 +0200 | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean |
| |
H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Jes Sorensen wrote: >> >>> That's how the ABI is defined. >> >> That the ABI for long long or the ABI for uint64_t? Given that u64 is a >> Linux thing, it ought to be ok to do the alignment the right way within >> the kernel. >> > > And what will break if you make that switch?
If we are lucky, some binary only modules? :-)
But you're right, it may just have to be documented as one of those nasty issues to watch out for.
Cheers, Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |