[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] introduce atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave()

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> > Why does this need protection against interrupts?
> uidhash_lock can be taken from irq context. For example, delayed_put_task_struct()
> does __put_task_struct()->free_uid().

AFAICT it's called via rcu, does that mean anything released via rcu has
to be protected against interrupts?

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-30 12:55    [W:0.079 / U:2.720 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site