lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectreproducible reiserfs bug with kernel 2.6.17
Hi,

Probably I stumbled on a reiserfs race condition bug.

I get an infinite loop of messages like
"ReiserFS: md1: warning: vs-13060: reiserfs_update_sd: stat data of object [3 29 0x0 SD] (nlink == 1) not found (pos 1)"
at a certain time when writing data to a reiser filesystem with our application.


With debug information for reiserfs enabled I get this dump:


REISERFS: panic (device Null superblock): reiserfs[1942]: assertion !( vn->vn_mode == 'i' || vn->vn_mode == 'p' ) failed at fs/reiserfs/fix_node.c:237:check_left: vs-8055: invalid mode or balance condition failed


ksymoops 2.4.9 on i686 2.6.17.7-seekport. Options used
-V (default)
-K (specified)
-L (specified)
-O (specified)
-m /boot/System.map-2.6.17.7-seekport (default)

kernel BUG at fs/reiserfs/prints.c:362!
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c01a4c81>] Not tainted VLI
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010282 (2.6.17.7-seekport #2)
eax: 000000dc ebx: c03bb680 ecx: 00000001 edx: 00000286
esi: 00000000 edi: 00000140 ebp: 00000005 esp: e68bd980
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Stack: c03c7aa0 c03bb680 c05064c0 000006ac e68bdb00 e084a000 c019d270 00000000
c03c4060 00000796 000000ed c03a0c5d ded24d54 00000005 e084a01c 00000000
e68bdb00 000006ac 0000000f c019eedb e68bdb00 00000000 000006ac 00000004
Call Trace:
<c019d270> check_left+0x103/0x23f <c019eedb> ip_check_balance+0x304/0xcce
<c013bc34> activate_page+0xa2/0xa4 <c01a101c> fix_nodes+0x1f6/0x581
<c01b16fa> reiserfs_paste_into_item+0xf1/0x1f0 <c0199c2b> reiserfs_allocate_blocks_for_region+0xa7a/0x16ee
<c01ac737> pathrelse+0x29/0x81 <c019b35c> reiserfs_prepare_file_region_for_write+0x346/0x96b
<c019ad6f> reiserfs_submit_file_region_for_write+0x18c/0x24d <c019c090> reiserfs_file_write+0x70f/0x769
<c0134e03> file_read_actor+0x0/0xec <c011426f> find_busiest_group+0xd6/0x305
<c019b981> reiserfs_file_write+0x0/0x769 <c01517fc> vfs_write+0x9e/0x10d
<c015193c> sys_write+0x51/0x80 <c0102be3> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Code: 40 01 00 00 89 04 24 e8 ff fc ff ff 89 d8 85 f6 c7 44 24 08 c0 64 50 c0 c7 04 24 a0 7a 3c c0 0f 45 c7 89 44 24 04 e8 8c 5a f7 ff <0f> 0b 6a 01 33 bc 3b c0 85 f6 c7 44 24 08 c0 64 50 c0 c7 04 24



>>>>EIP; c01a4c81 <reiserfs_panic+51/76> <=====


>>>>ebx; c03bb680 <__func__.0+a706/6614a>
>>>>esp; e68bd980 <pg0+2639c980/3fadd400>


Trace; c019d270 <check_left+103/23f>
Trace; c013bc34 <activate_page+a2/a4>
Trace; c01b16fa <reiserfs_paste_into_item+f1/1f0>
Trace; c01ac737 <pathrelse+29/81>
Trace; c019ad6f <reiserfs_submit_file_region_for_write+18c/24d>
Trace; c0134e03 <file_read_actor+0/ec>
Trace; c019b981 <reiserfs_file_write+0/769>
Trace; c015193c <sys_write+51/80>

This architecture has variable length instructions, decoding before eip
is unreliable, take these instructions with a pinch of salt.

Code; c01a4c56 <reiserfs_panic+26/76>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c01a4c56 <reiserfs_panic+26/76>
0: 40 inc %eax
Code; c01a4c57 <reiserfs_panic+27/76>
1: 01 00 add %eax,(%eax)
Code; c01a4c59 <reiserfs_panic+29/76>
3: 00 89 04 24 e8 ff add %cl,0xffe82404(%ecx)
Code; c01a4c5f <reiserfs_panic+2f/76>
9: fc cld
Code; c01a4c60 <reiserfs_panic+30/76>
a: ff (bad)
Code; c01a4c61 <reiserfs_panic+31/76>
b: ff 89 d8 85 f6 c7 decl 0xc7f685d8(%ecx)
Code; c01a4c67 <reiserfs_panic+37/76>
11: 44 inc %esp
Code; c01a4c68 <reiserfs_panic+38/76>
12: 24 08 and $0x8,%al
Code; c01a4c6a <reiserfs_panic+3a/76>
14: c0 64 50 c0 c7 shlb $0xc7,0xffffffc0(%eax,%edx,2)
Code; c01a4c6f <reiserfs_panic+3f/76>
19: 04 24 add $0x24,%al
Code; c01a4c71 <reiserfs_panic+41/76>
1b: a0 7a 3c c0 0f mov 0xfc03c7a,%al
Code; c01a4c76 <reiserfs_panic+46/76>
20: 45 inc %ebp
Code; c01a4c77 <reiserfs_panic+47/76>
21: c7 89 44 24 04 e8 8c movl $0xfff75a8c,0xe8042444(%ecx)
Code; c01a4c7e <reiserfs_panic+4e/76>
28: 5a f7 ff

This decode from eip onwards should be reliable

Code; c01a4c81 <reiserfs_panic+51/76>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c01a4c81 <reiserfs_panic+51/76> <=====
0: 0f 0b ud2a <=====
Code; c01a4c83 <reiserfs_panic+53/76>
2: 6a 01 push $0x1
Code; c01a4c85 <reiserfs_panic+55/76>
4: 33 bc 3b c0 85 f6 c7 xor 0xc7f685c0(%ebx,%edi,1),%edi
Code; c01a4c8c <reiserfs_panic+5c/76>
b: 44 inc %esp
Code; c01a4c8d <reiserfs_panic+5d/76>
c: 24 08 and $0x8,%al
Code; c01a4c8f <reiserfs_panic+5f/76>
e: c0 64 50 c0 c7 shlb $0xc7,0xffffffc0(%eax,%edx,2)
Code; c01a4c94 <reiserfs_panic+64/76>
13: 04 24 add $0x24,%al

EIP: [<c01a4c81>] reiserfs_panic+0x51/0x76 SS:ESP 0068:e68bd980
<c011cbbf> do_exit+0x375/0x37a <c0103f7a> do_trap+0x0/0x108
<c01042fb> do_invalid_op+0x0/0xc3 <c01043a9> do_invalid_op+0xae/0xc3
<c011547f> __wake_up+0x40/0x56 <c01a4c81> reiserfs_panic+0x51/0x76
<c011aab5> release_console_sem+0xb0/0xb2 <c011a8cb> vprintk+0x1a3/0x26a
<c021a33c> vsprintf+0x27/0x2b <c01036e3> error_code+0x4f/0x54
<c01a4c81> reiserfs_panic+0x51/0x76 <c019d270> check_left+0x103/0x23f
<c019eedb> ip_check_balance+0x304/0xcce <c013bc34> activate_page+0xa2/0xa4
<c01a101c> fix_nodes+0x1f6/0x581 <c01b16fa> reiserfs_paste_into_item+0xf1/0x1f0
<c0199c2b> reiserfs_allocate_blocks_for_region+0xa7a/0x16ee <c01ac737> pathrelse+0x29/0x81
<c019b35c> reiserfs_prepare_file_region_for_write+0x346/0x96b <c019ad6f> reiserfs_submit_file_region_for_write+0x18c/0x24d
<c019c090> reiserfs_file_write+0x70f/0x769 <c0134e03> file_read_actor+0x0/0xec
<c011426f> find_busiest_group+0xd6/0x305 <c019b981> reiserfs_file_write+0x0/0x769
<c01517fc> vfs_write+0x9e/0x10d <c015193c> sys_write+0x51/0x80
<c0102be3> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Warning (Oops_read): Code line not seen, dumping what data is available

>>>>EIP; c01a4c81 <reiserfs_panic+51/76> <=====

1 warning issued. Results may not be reliable.


The occurrence of this error seems to depend on the amount of data. The same
process has run hundreds of times without any problems but with a slightly
different amount of data. On the other hand we had this error twice
on different servers with different data.

With the source data from an affected server I am able to reproduce the
error on another server so it is unlikely that this a hardware error.

With sequentially writing 1 GB files using dd on the same partition
the error does not appear.

Environment:
SUN v65x Server (Intel based) with
2 * 2.8 Ghz Intel Pentium 4/Xeon Processors
2 GB RAM
SCSI Adaptec AIC-7902 U320 onboard
SCSI disks in MD raid 0 or raid 1 mode
the kernel is vanilla 2.6.17.7
( 2.6.12.2 or 2.6.16.20 are also affected )
gcc is 3.3.5


Please cc me if possible, I'm not subscribed.

Thanks,

Daniel Kowalewski

--
Daniel Kowalewski
Seekport Internet Technologies GmbH
Fraunhoferstr. 17, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
d.kowalewski@seekport.biz www.seekport.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-03 15:39    [W:0.028 / U:0.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site