lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Userspace visible of 3 include/asm/ headers
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:51:38PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>> On different architectures, we have the following values for
>>> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE:
>>> - 256
>>> - 512
>>> - 896
>>> - 1024
>>> - 4096
>>>
>>> What should be the common value?
>>> 4096?
>>>
>>> And I have a rough memory of some dependencies of COMMAND_LINE_SIZE and
>>> boot loaders. What exactly must be taken care of when increasing
>>> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE?
>>>
>> It's architecture-dependent; it probably should be defined in something
>> like <asm/cmdline.h>.
>
> OK, I did misunderstand you.
> I tought you were saying it should be the same value for all
> architectures.
>
> With the exception of frv (in param.h), COMMAND_LINE_SIZE is in setup.h
> on all architectures.
>
> Do we want to move it to a different header, or simply make param.h a
> userspace header on all architectures?
>

I figure it should be broken out into a separate header, rather than
exporting all of setup.h.

-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-04 03:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans