Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:05:12 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/33] i386: CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START cleanup |
| |
> > Stupid questions: > - Why do we still have a linux/config.h if it is totally redundant. > - Why don't we have at least a #warning in linux/config.h that would > tell us not to include it. > - Why do we still have about 200 includes of linux/config.h in the > kernel tree? > > I would much rather have a compile error, or at least a compile > warning rather than needed a code review to notice this error. In progress. As part of the ongoing header cleanup all include <config.h> are being removed and a warning is included in config.h.
When the change was done I did not want to spew out thousands of warning for a simple thing like this.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |