[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] NOMMU: Set BDI capabilities for /dev/mem and /dev/kmem
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 19:39:54 +0100
David Howells <> wrote:

> Andrew Morton <> wrote:
> > #else
> > #define get_unmapped_area_mem NULL
> > #endif
> Blech.
> Of course, I could just declare the new symbols weak, and stick
> get_unmapped_area_mem() and mem_bdi in their own file which would be
> conditional on !CONFIG_MMU.

Or you could use the approach I suggested, like wot everyone else does.

> > This changes behaviour, doesn't it?
> Yes.
> > But only for !CONFIG_MMU kernels?
> Yes. For the moment, nothing in MMU world actually looks at these
> capabilities, though perhaps they should.
> > Perhaps some additional commentary around this is needed.
> Perhaps... or perhaps it should have different capabilities if there's an MMU.
> Is doing a private mapping of /dev/mem a valid thing to do anyway, even if
> there is an MMU?

It would be strange, I guess. But the important thing is to not change
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-29 21:35    [W:0.052 / U:13.704 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site