Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:40:17 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent? |
| |
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:56:54 +0200 Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> While I'm sure it's an interesting intellectual exercise to do these > advanced rwsems it would be better for everybody else to go for a single > maintainable C implementation.
metoo. It's irritating having multiple implementations around, never being sure which version people are running with. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |