Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros | Date | Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:09:10 +0200 |
| |
On Monday 28 August 2006 09:46, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > we or the (g)libc headers ? > I don't think having libc do it. In order to use these macros, you always had to #include <linux/unistd.h> or <asm/unistd.h>.
Putting the headers into a libc file means that user code would need to change its includes, when it really should just use <sys/syscall.h>.
Changing the libc copy of asm/unistd.h is against our current plan to get to a point where `make headers_install' gets you a working tree. _If_ we want to have it in there, it needs to be in the kernel source.
Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |