lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates
    On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:53:02 +0530
    Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:

    > > >
    > > > rcutorture fix patches independent of rcu implementation changes
    > > > in this patchset.
    > >
    > > So this patchset is largely orthogonal to the presently-queued stuff?
    >
    > Yes, it should be.

    OK.

    > > > > Now what?
    > > >
    > > > Heh. I can always re-submit against -mm after I wait for a day or two
    > > > for comments :)
    > >
    > > That would be good, thanks. We were seriously considering merging all the
    > > SRCU stuff for 2.6.18, because
    >
    > I think non-srcu rcutorture patches can be merged in 2.6.19. srcu
    > is a tossup. Perhaps srcu and this patchset may be merge candidates
    > for 2.6.20 should things go well in review and testing.

    Oh. I was planning on merging *rcu* into 2.6.19-rc1.

    > Should I re-submit
    > against 2.6.18-mm1 or so (after your patchset reduces in size) ?
    > What is a convenient time ?

    Any time..

    > GAh! cpufreq.

    heh.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-29 02:31    [W:0.027 / U:62.160 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site