[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] RCU: various merge candidates
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:46:42 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <> wrote:

> srcu (sleepable rcu) patches independent of the core RCU implementation
> changes in the patchset. You can queue these up either before
> or after srcu.
> ...
> rcutorture fix patches independent of rcu implementation changes
> in this patchset.

So this patchset is largely orthogonal to the presently-queued stuff?

> >
> > Now what?
> Heh. I can always re-submit against -mm after I wait for a day or two
> for comments :)

That would be good, thanks. We were seriously considering merging all the
SRCU stuff for 2.6.18, because
cpufreq-make-the-transition_notifier-chain-use-srcu.patch fixes a cpufreq
down()-in-irq-disabled warning at suspend time.

But that's a lot of new stuff just to fix a warning about something which
won't actually cause any misbehaviour. We could just as well do

if (irqs_disabled())
down_read_trylock(...); /* suspend */

in cpufreq to temporarily shut the thing up.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-28 21:45    [W:0.068 / U:0.820 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site