[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] maximum latency tracking infrastructure (version 3)

    > Another question is how one would do callback processing in idle handler:
    > one could figure out the idle mode (latency) in advance and *then* call
    > only all those idle callbacks that have more stringent requirements
    > than the currently calculated idle mode's latency (and then calculate
    > the idle mode again based on the current time after all those callbacks??),
    > or one could just unconditionally call all idle handlers and then figure out
    > idle length and go to sleep. Which one is better?

    I'm not sure about either actually. Well if it's just to refill stuff
    etc then I would just call all. After all it may save interrupts and
    early wakeups if you do this, so there's a power advantage to be gained.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-28 18:51    [W:0.019 / U:5.812 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site