lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    Subject[PATCH 2/2] ACPI memory_hotplug cleanups
    Am Fr 25.08.2006 13:59 schrieb Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>:
    >
    >>
    >> > I sent a patch a while ago that gets rid of the whole namespace
    >> > walking
    >> > by making acpi_memoryhotplug an acpi device and making use of the
    >> > .add
    >> > callback function and the acpi_bus_register_driver call.
    >> >
    >> > I am not sure whether this is possible if you have multiple memory
    >> > devices, though (if not maybe it should be made possible?)...
    >> >
    >> > Yasunori even tested the patch and sent an Ok:
    >> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114065312400001&r=1&w=2
    >> >
    >> > If this is acceptable I can rebase the patch on a current kernel.
    >>
    >> Hi. Thomas-san.
    >> Did you rebase your patch?
    >>
    >> I'm trying to do it now too.
    >> But, current code (2.6.18-rc4) seems to register handler for
    >> only enable status devices at boot time.
    >> So, notification is -discarded- due to no handler for new memory
    >> device when hot-add event occurs. Hmmm. :-(
    >>
    > Looking a bit deeper into this I think some more things can be
    > optimised.
    >The author's email address also seems to be invalid
    >(naveen.b.s@intel.com)?
    >
    >More cleanups attached (on top of the last one).
    >Again only compile tested and patch attached not inlined
    >
    >(I forgot to upload the patch in my previous mail? Will resend...).
    >
    >BTW: I will be on holidays the next days, expect that it may take
    >some time until I answer...
    >
    >    Thomas
    >     Thomas
    >
    [unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-27 17:21    [W:0.023 / U:29.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site