Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:38:17 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2006-08-24-00-22.tar.gz uploaded |
| |
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:52:28 +0200 "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On 24/08/06, akpm@osdl.org <akpm@osdl.org> wrote: > > The mm snapshot broken-out-2006-08-24-00-22.tar.gz has been uploaded to > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2006-08-24-00-22.tar.gz > > > > It contains the following patches against 2.6.18-rc4: > > I haven't seen this on 2.6.18-rc4-mm2. Any idea which patch is causing > this soft lockup? > > BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! > [<c01041b5>] dump_trace+0x64/0x1b2 > [<c0104315>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25 > [<c0104985>] show_trace+0xd/0x10 > [<c0104a4d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > [<c014f40d>] softlockup_tick+0xc5/0xd9 > [<c012a0c7>] run_local_timers+0x12/0x14 > [<c012a329>] update_process_times+0x40/0x65 > [<c0113cc7>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x77 > [<c0103ce2>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30 > DWARF2 unwinder stuck at apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30 > Leftover inexact backtrace:
Sigh, useless.
> [<c0104315>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25 > [<c0104985>] show_trace+0xd/0x10 > [<c0104a4d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > [<c014f40d>] softlockup_tick+0xc5/0xd9 > [<c012a0c7>] run_local_timers+0x12/0x14 > [<c012a329>] update_process_times+0x40/0x65 > [<c0113cc7>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x77 > [<c0103ce2>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x2a/0x30 > [<c01f3010>] __delay+0x9/0xb > [<c01ffc47>] _raw_spin_lock+0xca/0x11d > [<c02f86a8>] _spin_lock+0x2a/0x32 > [<c013cc4e>] do_futex+0xee/0xd9a > [<c013d9d4>] sys_futex+0xda/0xf0 > [<c01031b5>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
There are a couple of recent futex changes, but they're fairly innocent-looking. What is the workload?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |