Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:57:24 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/18] 2.6.17.9 perfmon2 patch for review: PMU context switch support |
| |
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:06:01 -0700 Stephane Eranian <eranian@frankl.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
> +#define PFM_LAST_CPU(ctx, act) \ > + ((ctx)->last_cpu == smp_processor_id() && (ctx)->last_act == act)
Hiding this in a macro rather invites mistakes. Has all this code been thoroughly tested with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, to detect use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible code? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |