lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface)
    Paul Jackson wrote:
    >>this doesn't allow memory overcommitment, does it?
    >
    >
    > Uh - no - I don't think so. You can over commit
    > the memory of a task in a small cpuset just as well
    > as you can a task in a big cpuset or even one in the
    > top cpuset covering the entire system.
    >
    > Perhaps I didn't understand your point.
    My point was that when you have lots of containers
    their summary memory limit can be much higher then available RAM.
    This allows bursts of memory usage for containers, since
    it is very unlikely for all of them to consume the memory
    simulatenously. E.g. hosters usually oversell memory
    say 2 times on the node.

    So the question was whether it is possbile to overcommit memory
    with NUMA emulation?

    Thanks,
    Kirill

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-22 10:53    [W:0.020 / U:0.044 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site