[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [mm patch] drm, minor fixes
>> are you sure the callers of these don't wrap it inside a DRM_ERR()
>> macro ?
> I changed the values when:
> - I've checked what seemed right, getting back to the system call.
> drm_ioctl(), through a call to func().
> That's the case for:
> - the EFAULT value in i915_emit_box
> - two EINVAL values in drm_setversion
> - the return value wasn't used. That was the case for
> drm_set_busid return values, I felt having returned values negative
> from the start was more consistent.
> Is there a particular change that looked suspicious to you?

These are all actual bugs , however I doubt any of the codepaths are
causing a major problem, a lot of those code paths are for older X
systems or not very likely hit, I'll pull the fixes into the DRM tree
now... the i915 one is a worry I must give out the TG/Intel folks :-)


David Airlie, Software Engineer / airlied at
Linux kernel - DRI, VAX / pam_smb / ILUG

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-21 13:25    [W:0.082 / U:25.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site