Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:06:21 +0200 (CEST) | From | Roman Zippel <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1 - time moving at 3x speed, bisect finished |
| |
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Can you narrow it down to a specific patch in -mm? > > > The guilty patch is: > ntp-add-ntp_update_frequency.patch
That's really weird, I don't really have an idea why it should go wrong there, could you please try the patch below and send me the kernel output? Thanks.
bye, Roman
--- kernel/time/ntp.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6-mm/kernel/time/ntp.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6-mm.orig/kernel/time/ntp.c +++ linux-2.6-mm/kernel/time/ntp.c @@ -46,12 +46,21 @@ long time_adjust; static void ntp_update_frequency(void) { tick_length_base = (u64)(tick_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC * USER_HZ) << TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT; + printk("%Lx,", tick_length_base); tick_length_base += (s64)CLOCK_TICK_ADJUST << TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT; + printk("%Lx,", tick_length_base); tick_length_base += (s64)time_freq << (TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT - SHIFT_NSEC); + printk("%Lx,", tick_length_base); do_div(tick_length_base, HZ); + printk("%Lx\n", tick_length_base); tick_nsec = tick_length_base >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT; + printk("u: %u.%06u, %ld.%04lu\n", + (u32)(tick_length_base >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT), + (u32)(((tick_length_base & ((1ll << TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT) - 1)) * 1000000) >> TICK_LENGTH_SHIFT), + time_offset >> SHIFT_UPDATE, + ((time_offset & ((1 << SHIFT_UPDATE) - 1)) * 1000) >> SHIFT_UPDATE); } /** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |