Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:10:54 +0400 | From | Alexey Dobriyan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] fs.h: ifdef security fields |
| |
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 19:14 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > > > > @@ -552,7 +552,9 @@ struct inode { > > > > unsigned int i_flags; > > > > > > > > atomic_t i_writecount; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY > > > > void *i_security; > > > > +#endif > > > > union { > > > > void *generic_ip; > > > > } u; > > > > @@ -688,8 +690,9 @@ struct file { > > > > struct file_ra_state f_ra; > > > > > > > > unsigned long f_version; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX > > > > > > This should just be CONFIG_SECURITY. > > > > After another user appear. > > I see. Well, if that's the rationale, I thought that seclvl was also > scheduled for removal in 2.6.18 with the agreement of its maintainer, so > that would also apply to i_security.
OK, I see seclvl removal patch has been sent and have found couple more highly greppable fields: "security". :-) There will be bigger patch.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |