lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] fs.h: ifdef security fields
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 19:14 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > @@ -552,7 +552,9 @@ struct inode {
> > > > unsigned int i_flags;
> > > >
> > > > atomic_t i_writecount;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > > > void *i_security;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > union {
> > > > void *generic_ip;
> > > > } u;
> > > > @@ -688,8 +690,9 @@ struct file {
> > > > struct file_ra_state f_ra;
> > > >
> > > > unsigned long f_version;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX
> > >
> > > This should just be CONFIG_SECURITY.
> >
> > After another user appear.
>
> I see. Well, if that's the rationale, I thought that seclvl was also
> scheduled for removal in 2.6.18 with the agreement of its maintainer, so
> that would also apply to i_security.

OK, I see seclvl removal patch has been sent and have found couple more
highly greppable fields: "security". :-) There will be bigger patch.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-02 21:13    [W:0.156 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site