[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Solaris ZFS on Linux
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Kyle Moffett <> writes:
>>IMHO the best alternative for a situation like that is a storage
>>controller with a battery-backed cache and a hunk of flash NVRAM for
>>when the power shuts off (just in case you run out of battery), as
>>well as a separate 1GB battery-backed PCI ramdisk for an external
>>journal device (likewise equipped with flash NVRAM). It doesn't take

> Not sure - reading flash is fast, but writing is quite slow.
> A digital camera can consume a set of 2 or 4 2500 mAh AA cells
> for a fraction of 1 GB (of course, only a part of power goes
> to flash).

Yeah - that's why I said in the original message that it's not
especially lower in energy - the energy is used at a lower rate,
so is much cheaper to supply.
's datasheet says to program the 32Mbyte chip takes about 30mw*120s, or
3.5J or so.
For a gigabyte, that's 100J - a fairly substantial amount of energy.
However - it's at a low rate, so it's not _too_ expensive to supply.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-02 20:17    [W:0.274 / U:4.192 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site