lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
    Andrew Morton wrote:

    > - We expect that the lots-of-dirty-anon-memory-over-swap-over-network
    > scenario might still cause deadlocks.
    >
    > I assert that this can be solved by putting swap on local disks. Peter
    > asserts that this isn't acceptable due to disk unreliability. I point
    > out that local disk reliability can be increased via MD, all goes quiet.
    >
    > A good exposition which helps us to understand whether and why a
    > significant proportion of the target user base still wishes to do
    > swap-over-network would be useful.

    You cannot put disks in many models of blade servers.

    At all.

    --
    What is important? What you want to be true, or what is true?
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-19 17:11    [W:0.040 / U:0.884 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site