Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 19 Aug 2006 06:45:33 +0200 | From | Willy Tarreau <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1 |
| |
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:25:01AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:16:11AM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote: > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Can you send me the .config's you are using for 2.4 and 2.6 > > > (preferably for kernel.org kernels)? > > > > > > > I can send you only the current 2.4 config I use (not exactly vanilla). > > Thanks, but it didn't help me much since it needed some work getting it > compiling with uClinux-2.4.31-uc0, and the next step of creating a > functionally equivalent 2.6 kernel doesn't seem to be reasonably > possible.
In his case, it is a very valid reason to stay on 2.4 right now, which was the original question IIRC.
> My aim is to compare the size of the compiled objects for finding what > causes size regressions in 2.6 compared to 2.4.
Sometimes it will be compilers, but not by that much. Gcc3.[34] generally produce bigger code than 2.95 at -O2, but I don't think that people in the embedded world still use 2.95 much.
Cheers, Willy
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |