Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:10:04 +0200 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/5] -fstack-protector feature: Add the Kconfig option |
| |
Andi Kleen wrote: >> the binary search argument in this case is moot, just having a config >> option doesn't break anything compile wise and each later step is >> self-compiling.. > > Not true when the config used for the binary search has stack protector > enabled. > oh? I thought I was pretty careful about that
looking over the patches again I can't find any reason for a non-compiling/working kernel; at any step.. can you show me the compile error you got or the bug you found?
Also, I generally like this order since this order allows you to bisect stackprotector patches itself, rather than the artificial "add a bunch of dead code and then suddenly turn the light on" approach.. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |