lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API)
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
>>We need more complex decrement/locking scheme than krefs
>>provide. e.g. in __put_beancounter() we need
>>atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() semantics for performance optimizations.
>
>
> Is it possible to put the locking in the destructor? It seems like that
> should give similar behavior.
objects live in hashes also so you need to distinguish objects being freed
on lookup somehow.

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-18 14:37    [W:0.135 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site