Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:36:17 +0400 | From | Kirill Korotaev <> | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 2/7] UBC: core (structures, API) |
| |
Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 15:45 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >>We need more complex decrement/locking scheme than krefs >>provide. e.g. in __put_beancounter() we need >>atomic_dec_and_lock_irqsave() semantics for performance optimizations. > > > Is it possible to put the locking in the destructor? It seems like that > should give similar behavior. objects live in hashes also so you need to distinguish objects being freed on lookup somehow.
Kirill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |