[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [take9 2/2] kevent: poll/select() notifications. Timer notifications.
    On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 05:40:32PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
    > > What speaks against a patch the recplaces the epoll core by something that
    > > build on kevent while still supporting the epoll interface as a compatibility
    > > shim?
    > There is no problem from my side, but epoll and kevent_poll differs on
    > some aspects, so it can be better to not replace them for a while.

    Please explain the differences and why they are important. We really
    shouldn't keep on adding code without beeing able to replace older bits.
    If there's a really good reason we can keep things separate, but

    "epoll and kevent_poll differs on some aspects"

    is not one :)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2006-08-18 12:45    [W:0.023 / U:3.992 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site