Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:48:51 +0200 |
| |
> Right now, I'd prefer getting gcc 4 support than gcc 3.4, because I don't > know if even one common distro has shipped with gcc 3.4 by default. 2.95, > 3.0, and 3.3 have been common, and right now, 4.[01] is almost everywhere.
but most distros that ship with gcc 4 aren't capable of running a 2.4 kernel.... all the new distros greatly depend on sysfs for example, and ntpl in glibc requires 2.6 etc etc etc. So I'm rather sceptical about this argument. > > > Since there shouldn't be any reason for still using a 2.4 kernel > > except for "never change a running system", > > I think that by "never change", you meant "except for regular updates".
I think that you'll find that people who run 2.4 today, if you ask them, will say "please change as little as possible, only serious bugs and security issues". After all the people who run 2.4 still are generally those who resist new stuff in favor of stability of existing systems.... But maybe it's worth doing a user survey to find out what the users of 2.4 want... (and with that I mean users of the kernel.org 2.4 kernels, people who use enterprise distro kernels don't count for this since they'll not go to a newer released 2.4 anyway)
-- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |