lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Aug]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH] UBC: user resource beancounters
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:24:03PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
>
>>As the first step we want to propose for discussion
>>the most complicated parts of resource management:
>>kernel memory and virtual memory.
>
> Do you have any plans to post a CPU controller? Is that tied to UBC
> interface as well?

Not everything at once :) To tell the truth I think CPU controller
is even more complicated than user memory accounting/limiting.

No, fair CPU scheduler is not tied to UBC in any regard.
As we discussed before, it is valuable to have an ability to limit
different resources separately (CPU, disk I/O, memory, etc.).
For example, it can be possible to place some mission critical
kernel threads (like kjournald) in a separate contanier.

This patches are related to kernel memory and nothing more :)

Thanks,
Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-08-17 15:57    [W:0.442 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site