Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:46:19 +0200 | From | "Molle Bestefich" <> | Subject | Re: ext3 corruption |
| |
Horst H. von Brand wrote: > > > The kernel people are certainly not infallible either. And there are cases > > > where the right order is A B C, and others in which it is C B A, and still > > > others where it doesn't matter. > > > In the quite unlikely situation where that happens, you've obviously > > got a piece of software which is broken dependency-wise. Many of the > > current schemes will fail to accommodate that too. > > It isn't broken /software/, it is /different setups/.
It's broken software.
> > For example, no amount of moving the /etc/rc.d/rc6.d/K35smb script > > around will fix that situation on Red Hat. > > What situation?
The situation you outlined, where A can depend on B, which can depend on C, but in another usage scenario C can depend on B which can depend on A. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |