| Date | Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:39:40 +0530 | | From | Srivatsa Vaddagiri <> | | Subject | Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC][PATCH 4/7] UBC: syscalls (user interface) |
| |
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:39:43PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> +/* > + * The setbeanlimit syscall > + */ > +asmlinkage long sys_setublimit(uid_t uid, unsigned long resource, > + unsigned long *limits) > +{
[snip]
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&ub->ub_lock, flags); > + ub->ub_parms[resource].barrier = new_limits[0]; > + ub->ub_parms[resource].limit = new_limits[1];
Would it be usefull to notify the "resource" controller about this change in limits? For ex: in case of the CPU controller I wrote (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/4/9), I was finding it usefull to recv notification of changes to these limits, so that internal structures (which are kept per-task-group) can be updated.
-- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|